What is psychological egoism, and how does it differ from ethical egoism? What do you think is the best argument in favor of the theory? Do you think the theory. Psychological Egoism is the thesis that we always act from selfish motives. It holds that all don’t you see?” Taken from Feinberg, ‘Psychological Egoism’. Moral Motivation and Human Nature. Psychological Egoism*. JOEL FEINBERG. A. THE THEORY. 1. “PSYCHOLOGICAL EGOISM” is the name given to a theory.

Author: Galmaran Malaran
Country: Antigua & Barbuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 14 January 2012
Pages: 151
PDF File Size: 8.68 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.76 Mb
ISBN: 795-9-58847-572-9
Downloads: 43388
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gok

We think you have liked this presentation. Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives. Find it on Scholar. So I’m missing something or I’m misunderstanding the force of the conclusion. What sorts of conduct may the state rightly make criminal? Then when that desire was satisfied, Lincoln of course derived pleasure.

Feinberg contends that the logical statements can never entail contingent ones though he may unhelpfully mix up distinctions of logic and of meaning here. The opening argument he dubs a feinbfrg [14] from which “nothing whatever concerning the nature of my motives or the objective of my feinbeeg can possibly follow [ Share buttons are a little bit lower.

Joel Feinberg: Psychological Egoism

March 14, at 9: Newer Post Older Post Home. The thought experiment is designed to test the limits of our tolerance for harmless but deeply offensive forms of behavior.

One cannot truly enjoy a friendship if the end goal of engaging in the friendship is the joys of the friendship. According to Mill, the only kind of conduct that the state may rightly criminalize is conduct that causes harm to others. Feedback Privacy Policy Feedback. So our motivation cannot be simply driven by pleasure alone. History egiosm Western Philosophy.


Joel Feinberg

Review The Path Principle: The third argument, unlike the first two, contains no non sequitur that Feinberg feinbert see. If one unpacks the notion of happiness to include getting satisfaction from relationships with others, getting a sense of self-worth from achievements at work,getting a feeling of support and belonging by having close relationships with family members, feeling pride from having and being a good friend, etc.

We all occasionally sacrifice our own interests to those of others, if only to be polite, in many cases. Feinberg studied at the University of Michiganwriting his dissertation on the philosophy of the Harvard professor Ralph Barton Perry under the supervision of Charles Stevenson. Joel Feinberg presents a multitude of arguments against psychological egoistic hedonism.

Published by Isaiah Fowler Modified over 5 years ago.

Joshua May – – Internet Encyclopeida of Philosophy. Jofl Defence of Weak Psychological Egoism. His major four-volume work, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Lawwas published between and Nonetheless, they might contend that our other ultimate motives self-fulfillment, power, etc.

Supplement on Feinberg’s “Psychological Egoism”

He notes that this argument needs to make goodness and evil into metaphysical opposites like redness and nonredness. Oxford University Press,p.

Bruce Russell – – Philosophical Studies 42 1: Thursday, March 7, Joel Feinberg: Broad on Psychological Egoism.

An interest facet of enlightenment is that to achieve it one cannot desire it, this is a very interesting parallel to the discussion of psychological egoistic hedonism which deserves more consideration.


Psychological Egoism By Joel Feinberg

But let me put the following thought out there. The only way to achieve happiness, he believes, is to forget about it, but psychological egoists hold that all human endeavour, even that which achieves happiness, is geared towards happiness. The essay was originally composed by Professor Feinberg for his students inand appeared regularly in his Reason and Responsibility of which there were many editions published by Wadsworth.

It is equally possible that none of our actions are selfish, even the ones that look most selfish. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Feinberg held many major fellowships during his career and lectured by invitation at universities around the world. Classical and Contemporary Readings sixth edition Belmont: Can you help me clarify?

Law Political philosophy more Languages Deutsch Edit links.

A logical mistake is made in the first argument. The only way to achieve the desire is to no longer desire it. The Paradox of Hedonism: If so, it’s an interesting argument, but I feel that I can still intuitively feibnerg sense of the notion of desiring happiness alone. He answer the arguments as follows: Her desire to win makes egosm anxious during her matches, and thus she does not play well and loses.

Author: admin